Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with lupus nephritis: a single-center, real-world retrospective study.

Telitacicept, an innovative drug used for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), can effectively control disease progression and achieve favorable outcomes. While case reports have mentioned the use of Telitacicept in lupus nephritis (LN) treatment, its safety and efficacy in treating patients with LN have not been explored. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Telitacicept in managing patients with LN. In a single-center, real-world retrospective study, 30 LN patients with poor response or adverse reactions to conventional glucocorticoids at our Hospital were enrolled to receive Telitacicept. Patients were administered 160mg of Telitacicept subcutaneously once a week for at least 24weeks in addition to standard treatment. We assessed the SLE responder index-4 (SRI-4) at the beginning and the end of the treatment period, measured laboratory test indicators at 3, 6, and 9months, and observed the occurrence of adverse events in these patients. The SRI-4 response rate was 86.67% (n = 26), with a significantly lower systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score compared to the baseline. Post Telitacicept treatment, glucocorticoid intake of patients with LN significantly reduced from 50 (IQR:40, 51.25) at baseline to 10 (IQR:5,10) at the endpoint (Z = -6.547, p < 0.001). Patients with LN showed significantly improved urine occult blood levels after Telitacicept therapy. While the complement (C3 and C4) contents increased, immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) reduced markedly (p < 0.001). The negative rate of dsDNA reached 26.67% and adverse events were alleviated post treatment. Only two cases of LN-related adverse reactions were reported, including herpes and infectious fever, respectively. Telitacicept primarily serves as an agent for the induction of remission therapy, with an attainment of complete remission rate standing at a commendable 73.3%. Telitacicept treatment reduced disease severity in patients with LN. The initial clinical trial provided supportive evidence for the effectiveness and safety of Telitacicept as a viable treatment option for LN, allowing a reduction in the daily glucocorticoid intake while maintaining a good safety profile, and improving hypocomplementation in LN management.

Evaluation of RNase therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised phase 2a clinical trial of RSLV-132

BackgroundCirculating, extracellular RNA is the primary trigger of type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and interferon is known to play a central pathogenic role in the disease. RSLV-132...

Safety and efficacy of telitacicept in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus patients who failed treatment with belimumab : Acase series.

This study aimed to determine the effect and safety of telitacicept, an antagonist of BLyS/APRIL-mediated Bcell activation, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who failed treatment with belimumab and in whom telitacicept was administered combined with conventional therapy. Areview of published reports on telitacicept for SLE was also performed. Aretrospective review was performed of the records of patients seen in the Department of Rheumatology at the Wuhan Hospital of Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, China, with refractory SLE who had failed treatment with belimumab. The terms "systemic lupus erythematosus" and "telitacicept" were used to identify patients reported in the English medical literature. Identified were 14refractory SLE patients, 3males (21%) and 11females(79%). The median age was 32.9years. The median disease duration was 8.9years. Patients in this cohort received telitacicept for an average of 34.1weeks (17-62weeks) and the total SLE responder index4 (SRI-4) response rate was 78.9% (n = 11). The mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score declined from 8.6 at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.87-9.28) to 4.29 at the endpoint (95% CI 3.4-5.16). All cases (100%) had hypocomplementemia at baseline, and 7cases (50%) reported normal C3 and C4 levels at the follow-up endpoint. At the observation endpoint, the 24‑h urinary protein value of the 13cases with proteinuria (baseline 24‑h urinary protein > 0.5 g/d) displayed areduction, and 3values turned negative. Although some patients had low serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, subnormal IgG levels, and absolute counts of peripheral blood lymphocytes after treatment, no serious infection was reported. One case was refractory lupus hepatitis confirmed by liver pathology, and upon change to change to telitacicept treatment, liver function returned to normal. This is the first case series in SLE patients who accepted telitacicept treatment after failed treatment with belimumab. Our case series and review of the literature show that telitacicept combined with the original standard treatment may significantly improve disease activity while reducing prednisone use. No major safety issues were seen in this group of patients. Telitacicept may be apromising drug for the treatment of refractory lupus hepatitis.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab in a subgroup of South Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus enrolled into a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in North East Asia.

This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg in the South Korean subgroup of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) enrolled in the North East Asia (NEA) study (GSK Study BEL113750; NCT01345253). NEA was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 trial. Patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE were randomized 2:1 to belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy administered on Days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 28 days up to Week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint in this analysis was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response rate at Week 52, defined as the proportion of patients achieving a ≥4-point reduction in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score, no worsening (<0.3 increase from baseline) in Physician Global Assessment, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A domain and <2 new BILAG B domain scores. Among 100 South Korean patients enrolled in NEA, 54/66 (81.8%) belimumab- and 24/34 (70.6%) placebo-treated patients completed the double-blind phase. Significantly more belimumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved SRI-4 response at Week 52 (n = 35/66, 53.0% vs. n = 8/34, 23.5%; odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)]: 3.67 [1.45, 9.28]; p = .0061). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 adverse event was similar between groups (belimumab: n = 60/66, 90.9% vs. placebo: n = 31/34, 91.2%). No new safety signals emerged in this subgroup analysis. Belimumab was efficacious for the treatment of SLE and well tolerated among the South Korean subgroup of patients from the NEA study.

Telitacicept in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

ObjectivesThis phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a novel fusion protein that neutralises signals of B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand, in...

Model-based meta-analysis using latent variable modeling to set benchmarks for new treatments of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Several investigational agents are under evaluation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials but quantitative frameworks to enable comparison of their efficacy to reference benchmark treatments are lacking. To benchmark SLE treatment effects and identify clinically important covariates, we developed a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) within a latent variable model framework for efficacy end points and SLE composite end point scores (BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index) using aggregate-level data on approved and investigational therapeutics. SLE trials were searched using PubMed and www.clinicaltrials.gov for treatment name, SLE and clinical trial as search criteria that resulted in four data structures: (1) study and investigational agent, (2) dose and regimen, (3) baseline descriptors, and (4) outcomes. The final dataset consisted of 25 studies and 81 treatment arms evaluating 16 different agents. A previously developed (K Goteti etal. 2022) SLE latent variable model of data from placebo arms (placebo + standard of care treatments) was used to describe aggregate SLE end points over time for the various SLE placebo and treatment arms in a Bayesian MBMA framework. Continuous dose-effect relationships using a maximum effect model were included for anifrolumab, belimumab, CC-220 (iberdomide), epratuzumab, lulizumab pegol, and sifalimumab, whereas the remaining treatments were modeled as discrete dose effects. The final MBMA model was then used to benchmark these compounds with respect to the maximal efficacy on the latent variable compared to the placebo. This MBMA illustrates the application of latent variable models in understanding the trajectories of composite end points in chronic diseases and should enable model-informed development of new investigational agents in SLE.

Effect of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with low dose or no corticosteroids.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) responder index (SRI)-4 response has been achieved with belimumab treatment in patients with moderate disease activity in cornerstone clinical trials and following studies. However, most studies involved patients treated with a mean prednisolone-equivalent dose of approximately 10 mg/d and focused on the steroid-sparing effect of belimumab. We aimed to identify the effect of belimumab in patients with mild-to-moderate SLE who were treated with low-dose or no corticosteroids. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients treated with belimumab for at least 6 months between May 2021 and June 2022. The primary endpoint was SRI-4 response at 6 months. Thirty-one patients were included (13 low dose- and 18 steroid non-users). The mean age was 39.2 ± 11.4 years, and 90.3% of patients were female. The baseline Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score was 6.0 (4.0-9.0). The primary endpoint was achieved in 32.3% (10/31) of patients. Significant improvements in anemia, C4 levels, and SELENA-SLEDAI score were observed during treatment. Univariate analysis showed that the baseline SELENA-SLEDAI and arthritis were significantly associated with SRI-4 response at 6 months, and only the SELENA-SLEDAI remained significant (p = 0.014) in multivariate analysis. This cohort study is the first to report the efficacy of belimumab after minimizing the effect of corticosteroids. Belimumab showed efficacy in improving the SELENA-SLEDAI score, anemia, and low C4 in patients who did not receive corticosteroids or received only low doses.

Efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicentre, retrospective, real-world study

ObjectiveTo examine the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in the treatment of patients with SLE in everyday clinical practice.MethodsSeventy-two patients with active SLE who received telitacicept for more than 24...

Impact of telemedicine on disease activity assessment: A case-crossover study nested within a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

The utilisation of telemedicine has been rapidly growing among patients with rheumatic diseases, especially following the corona virus disease 2019 pandemic. Ease and convenience appear to dominate the reasons for this growth. However, the effects of this approach in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are yet to be revealed. In this study, we examined the effect of telemedicine on disease activity assessment and damage scores in patients with SLE. This case-crossover study was nested within a national prospective cohort of patients with SLE in Saudi Arabia. Patients with SLE were included if they fulfilled the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria between March 2020 and March 2021 and were assessed at three time points with 3 months between assessments, according to the standardised protocol of this cohort. Telemedicine was conducted for the first evaluation, while in-person assessments were used at the second and third visits. The primary outcome was the difference in the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score. The primary analysis was conducted using the repeated measure model and adjusted for potential confounders, including demographics, medications, and changes in steroid doses. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to mitigate selection and time-varying confounders. A total of 92 participants were included in this study. Most patients were females (88%), with a mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of 36 (±13) years. The mean (±SD) disease activity scores at baseline were as follows: SLEDAI-2K, 5 (±5); SLE responder index, 3.8 (±3.5); Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index, 1 (±1). The mean difference in SLEDAI-2K score was -1.641 (95% confidence interval -2.773 to -0.510, p = 0.005*) between telemedicine and follow-up visits. The results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses. We found that telemedicine assessment was associated with a much higher disease activity score than subsequent assessments, which may suggest an overestimation of disease activity and later assessment accuracy. Cautious adoption has been suggested for SLE patients with active disease.

Safety and efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

BackgroundTo determine the safety and efficacy of biological agents used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in adults.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.Data sourcesMEDLINE (through Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au, ANZCTR.org.au and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for studies published from 20 May 2021 and 15 years prior. A grey literature search was performed and completed on 31 May 2021.Study criteriaPhase II, III or quasi randomised controlled trials, studies with only cerebral or cutaneous lupus were excluded. Data extraction: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted, reviewed data for accuracy, and used the Cochrane tool to assess risk of bias.ResultsForty-four studies were identified, consisting of 15 groups of drugs and 25 different biological agents, totalling 16,889 patients. The main outcomes assessed included Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI), BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and combined combined/partial renal remission (CRR/PRR).Four groups of biologics were found to improve outcomes. Anti-interferons: Anifrolumab increased BICLA response and SRI 5 to 8, decreased prednisone dosages, with increased herpes zoster infections, but fewer serious adverse events. Sifalimumab improved SRI but also increased herpes zoster infections. Anti BAFF/BLyS and/or APRIL: Belimumab consistently improved SRI 4, decreased prednisone dosages, increased combined CRR/PRR, and had no adverse safety outcomes. Tabalumab increased SRI 5 at 52 weeks with no steroid sparing effect but was associated with increased infusion related adverse events. Telitacicept improved SRI 4 at 52 weeks, with no increased adverse events, though data was rather sparse. Anti CD-20 monoclonal antibody, Obinutuzumab increased combined CRR/PRR at 1 and 2 years. Anti IL12/23 monoclonal antibody, Ustekinumab, increased SRI 4 to 6, but not BICLA at 24 weeks, with no concerning safety outcomes.ConclusionMultiple biologic agents are shown in high quality studies to have a significant therapeutic impact on outcomes in SLE.

Selection of indicators reporting response rate in pharmaceutical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus: preference and relative sensitivity

ObjectiveSLE is a common multisystem autoimmune disease with chronic inflammation. Many efficacy evaluation indicators of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) for SLE have been proposed but the comparability remains unknown. We...

Does baricitinib reduce disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Baricitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor that has recently been approved for treating certain autoimmune disorders. This meta-analysis pooled the conflicting results from all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We systemically searched four electronic databases. RCTs comparing baricitinib versus placebo were included. Our outcomes were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) in the random effects model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved a SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response. A total of three RCTs, comprising 1849 patients, were included. Baricitinib 4 mg was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients who attained SRI-4 response at week 24 (RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.05, 1.35], P < 0.01). However, this did not reach statistical significance with baricitinib 4 mg at week 52 and baricitinib 2 mg at both week 24 and week 52 (RR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.96, 1.34], P = 0.15; RR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.96, 1.24], P = 0.20; RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.92, 1.19], P = 0.50, respectively). The risk for serious infections was higher in the baricitinib 4 mg group (RR = 2.23, 95% CI [1.13, 4.37], P = 0.02). Baricitinib 2 mg did not show any clinical benefit. In contrast, baricitinib 4 mg might have the potential to reduce SLE disease activity; however, further research is required to evaluate its long-term efficacy. Until higher-quality evidence is developed, the benefits and risks of baricitinib should be considered before initiating its therapy. Key Points • Baricitinib is a selective Janus kinase inhibitor that has recently been approved for treating certain autoimmune disorders; however, its efficacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still inconclusive. • In our meta-analysis, baricitinib 2 mg did not show any clinical benefit. In contrast, baricitinib 4 mg significantly reduced SLE activity in terms of SRI-4 response at week 24. However, this did not reach statistical significance at week 52. • Further studies are required to investigate the long-term efficacy of baricitinib 4 mg in patients with SLE.

Belimumab versus anifrolumab in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: an indirect comparison of clinical response at 52 weeks

ObjectiveTo generate comparative efficacy evidence of belimumab versus anifrolumab in SLE that can inform treatment practices.MethodsThe SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 response at 52 weeks of belimumab versus anifrolumab was evaluated...

Sensitivity analysis of EQ-5D-3L index scores in terms of discriminative and known-groups validity in SLE: introducing Adequate Health State.

To investigate the ability of different EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) index scores to discriminate between verum drug and placebo (discriminant validity) as well as between responders and non-responders (known-groups validity) in the SLE patient population of two phase III clinical trials of belimumab. Data from the BLISS-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials (N = 1684), which both showed superiority of belimumab to placebo, were utilized. Responders were defined as SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) achievers at week 52. The Pearson's χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparisons, and logistic regression analysis was used for adjustments for confounders and assessment of independence. While full health state (FHS; EQ-5D index score 1) showed the best ability to discriminate between belimumab and placebo [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.47; 95% CI 1.11, 1.96; P = 0.008] and between SRI-4 responders and non-responders (adjusted OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.29, 10.98; P = 0.020), the discriminative ability of EQ-5D index scores 0.800 or more reached statistical significance for both discriminant validity (adjusted OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.02, 1.63; P = 0.036) and known-groups validity (adjusted OR 3.08; 95% CI 1.16, 9.69; P = 0.034). Overall, higher EQ-5D index scores were associated with increasing ability to discriminate between belimumab and placebo, and between responders and non-responders. EQ-5D index scores less stringent than FHS may be clinically relevant health-related quality of life goals of treatment in patients with SLE, introducing the concept of EQ-5D adequate health state when FHS is not achievable.

Effectiveness and Safety of Belimumab in Chinese Lupus Patients: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study.

Objective: The effectiveness and safety of belimumab in Chinese lupus patients with different disease activities were investigated in a real-world setting. Method: Patients who received 10 mg/kg belimumab intravenously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and then every 4 weeks on a background of standard-of-care (SoC) therapy and had a follow-up of more than 6 months were enrolled from four centers in China. They were stratified according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score at baseline as the moderate/severe (SELENA-SLEDAI > 6) or mild subgroups (SELENA-SLEDAI ≤ 6). Attainment of the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) or remission on treatment was analyzed in all patients. The SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) were evaluated for patients with moderate/severe disease and mild disease, respectively. Patients in the control arm with SoC alone from previous metformin lupus trials were selected by propensity score matching (PSM) as the reference group. Results: 224 SLE patients with a mean follow-up of 11.7 months receiving belimumab were enrolled in this observational study, of which 126 and 98 were in the moderate/severe and mild subgroup, respectively. At 12 months, 54.76% of the patients attained LLDAS and 28.57% attained remission. Lower daily prednisone at baseline were independently associated with 12-month LLDAS. Further, 87% of the subgroup with moderate/severe disease achieved SRI-4 at 12 months and a high SLEDAI at baseline was its predictive factor. For the mild subgroup, a reduced flare rate was observed compared with PSM reference (17.5%, vs. 38.6%, p = 0.021). Infection events, particularly viral infections and pneumonia were recorded in 7 and 6 patients, respectively. Conclusion: Our real-world data supported the effectiveness and safety of belimumab in Chinese lupus patients.

Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) mediates signaling of Type I interferons and IL-23, key cytokines involved in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis. Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of adults with plaque psoriasis. This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib in patients with active SLE.&#x0D; Methods: This 48-week, double-blind, phase 2 trial (NCT03252587) randomized patients 1:1:1:1 to deucravacitinib (3 mg BID, 6 mg BID, 12 mg QD) or placebo. Oral corticosteroid tapering was required from weeks 8-20; further tapering was optional from weeks 32-40. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI[4]) at week 32. Key secondary endpoints at week 48 included percentage of patients achieving SRI(4) and decrease of ≥50% from baseline Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI-50), in patients with baseline CLASI ≥10. Change from baseline in CLASI Activity Score (CLASI-A) over time was also assessed.&#x0D; Results: Of 363 randomized patients, 275 (76%) completed 48 weeks of treatment. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced across treatment groups, with baseline mean CLASI-A scores ranging from 8.0 to 8.6. The primary endpoint at week 32 was met, with significantly greater proportions of patients in deucravacitinib 3 mg BID and 6 mg BID groups vs placebo achieving SRI(4) responses (placebo: 34.4%; deucravacitinib 3 mg BID: 58.2%, P=0.0006; 6 mg BID: 49.5%, P=0.021; 12 mg QD: 44.9%, P=0.078). Patients treated with deucravacitinib demonstrated improvement across all secondary endpoints compared with placebo. In patients with CLASI ≥10 at baseline, greater mean changes from baseline in CLASI-A were observed in deucravacitinib vs placebo over 48 weeks of treatment (placebo: 16.7%; deucravacitinib 3 mg BID: 69.6%, P=0.0006; 6 mg BID: 56.0%, P=0.0058; 12 mg QD: 62.1%, P=0.0009). Rates of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs of interest were similar between deucravacitinib and placebo groups. Most common AEs with deucravacitinib were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, headache, and urinary tract infection. No deaths, major adverse cardiac events, thrombotic events, systemic opportunistic infections, or active tuberculosis occurred.&#x0D; Conclusion: Deucravacitinib demonstrated sustained, meaningful clinical efficacy in SRI(4), improvement in mucocutaneous activity as measured by CLASI-A responses, and was well tolerated in patients with active SLE up to 48 weeks.

Performance of systemic lupus erythematosus responder index for detecting clinician-rated responders in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

Disease activity measures in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are critical tools for trial endpoints. We aimed to evaluate the performance of current treatment outcome measures in SLE. Individuals with active SLE with a clinical SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of at least 4 were followed up for two or more visits and classified as responders and non-responders based on a physician's judgment of improvement. The treatment outcome measures including SLEDAI-2K responder index-50 (SRI-50), SLE responder index-4 (SRI-4), substituting SLEDAI-2K with SRI-50 in SRI-4 (SRI-4(50)), SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) responder index (Δ ≥ 1.72) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) were tested. The performance of those measures was shown by sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, accuracy, and agreement against a physician-rated improvement. Twenty-seven patients with active SLE were followed. The total cumulative pair of visits (baseline and follow up) was 48. The overall accuracies (95% confidence interval [CI]) of SRI-50, SRI-4, SRI-4(50), SLE-DAS, and BICLA for detecting responders in all patients were 72.9 (58.2-84.7), 75.0 (60.4-86.4), 72.9 (58.2-84.7), 75.0 (60.4-86.4), and 64.6 (49.5-77.8), respectively. Subgroup analyses of lupus nephritis (23 patients had a pair of visits) found the accuracies (95% CI) of SRI-50, SRI-4, SRI-4(50), SLE-DAS, and BICLA were 82.6 (61.2-95.0), 73.9 (51.6-89.8), 82.6 (61.2-95.0), 82.6 (61.2-95.0), and 78.3 (56.3-92.5), respectively. However, there were no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). SRI-4, SRI-50, SRI-4(50), SLE-DAS responder index, and BICLA demonstrated comparable abilities to identify clinician-rated responders in patients with active SLE and lupus nephritis.

Lupus low disease activity state attainment in the phase 3 TULIP trials of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus

ObjectivesIn patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) attainment is associated with improved outcomes. We investigated LLDAS attainment in anifrolumab-treated patients.MethodsWe performed post hoc analysis...

Research in Brief.

The tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor deucravacitinib might be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), according to a multicentre, phase 2, double-blind randomised trial by Eric Morand and colleagues. 363 adult patients with active SLE were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive deucravacitinib at a dose of 3 mg twice daily (n=91), 6 mg twice daily (n=93), or 12 mg once daily (n=89), or placebo (n=90). 31 (34%) patients on placebo achieved an SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response at week 32 (the primary outcome) versus 53 (58%) on deucravacitinib 3 mg twice daily (odds ratio [OR] 2·8, 95% CI 1·5–5·1; p<0·001 vs placebo), 46 (49%) on 6 mg twice daily (1·9, 1·0–3·4; p=0·02 vs placebo), and 40 (45%) on 12 mg once daily (1·6, 0·8–2·9; nominal p=0·08 vs placebo).

Time to onset of clinical response to anifrolumab in patients with SLE: pooled data from the phase III TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials

ObjectivesTo evaluate the time course of clinical response following anifrolumab treatment in patients with SLE.MethodsA post hoc analysis was conducted using pooled data from phase III, randomised, 52-week, placebo-controlled, Treatment...